Daniel Milavsky vs Charles Broom Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 13 Nov at 07:48 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
D. Milavsky vs C. Broom

USA
0
Win
Played
1
Win

GBR
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Milavsky 0 - 1 Broom
They have played 3 sets in total, with Daniel Milavsky winning 1 and Charles Broom winning 2. The last match between Charles Broom and Daniel Milavsky was at the Drummondville Challenger, 13-11-2025, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with Charles Broom getting the victory 2-6 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Milavsky | 0 |
| Broom | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) Drummondville Challenger(11-13-25)
D. Milavsky vs C. Broom H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $39,970 |
| 67.37% (64-31) | Career Total W/L | 62.17% (263-160) |
| 0 | Indoor | 1 |
| 4 | Titles | 8 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
D. Milavsky vs C. Broom Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Charles Broom recently won 43.17% of points on his second serve, compared to Daniel Milavsky's 46.88%. Which player has a slight edge here? Daniel Milavsky appears to have a slight advantage in second serve performance.
- Return Game Stats: Charles Broom has displayed a stronger return game, capturing 45.63% of opponent's second serve points over the same period versus Milavsky's 43.61%. For first serve returns, Broom leads with 27.74% as opposed to Milavsky's 25.04%.
- Break Point Resilience: Broom saved 52.92% of break points, while Milavsky saved 54.68%, indicating a close contest in high-pressure situations.
- Overall Performance: Milavsky edges out with a 71.83% win rate over the last year against Broom's 62.50%. Does this suggest who might control the match momentum? It implies Milavsky may have a steadier performance.
- Preferred Surfaces: Broom performs best on clay with a 67% win rate, whereas Milavsky shows strength on indoor hard courts, also with 67%. Both struggle on grass, but Milavsky has notably never won there.
- Competitive Levels: Both players primarily compete at the $10K Futures level with Milavsky slightly ahead at an 80% win rate compared to Broom's 79.41%.
- Rival Quality: Broom faced tougher competition, with opponents averaging a 328.68 rank, while Milavsky's opponents averaged 422.37.
- Deciding Set Performance: If the match goes to a deciding set, Milavsky holds a significant edge, winning 65% compared to Broom's 47%.
- Break Point Conversion: Broom has shown greater efficiency in converting break points, succeeding 35% of the time against Milavsky's 28.96%.
Editorial Prediction (November 13, 2025, UTC):
Taking a holistic view of their recent performance metrics, Daniel Milavsky holds a marginal edge in several key areas. His superior second serve points and overall match win rate over the past year suggest strong form.
However, Charles Broom's slightly better return game and break point conversion rate provide him with valuable assets for gaining control during crucial game points.
Considering the quality of opponents faced, Broom has experience against higher-ranked players, which may be advantageous. Yet, Milavsky's decisive advantage in matches going to deciding sets cannot be overlooked.
In light of these insights, while the match outcome is expected to be competitive, Daniel Milavsky is slightly favored to clinch the victory based on his stable and effective recent performances.
Daniel Milavsky vs Charles Broom Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
D. Milavsky vs C. Broom H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 1 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 12 | Games Won | 14 |
| 11 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:39:40 | Average Match Time | 1:39:40 |
| 54% (45/83) | 1st Serve % | 66% (44/67) |
| 73% (33/45) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (29/44) |
| 34% (13/38) | 2nd Serve Win % | 61% (14/23) |
| 67% (4/6) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (5/10) |
| 36% (24/67) | Return Points Win % | 45% (37/83) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
D. Milavsky Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 2-6 6-4 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-4 | ||
R2 | L | 6-3 3-6 7-6(6) | ||
R1 | W | 6-0 3-6 6-1 | ||
F | W | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | ||
C. Broom Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | W | 6-3 1-6 6-1 | ||
R2 | W | 2-6 6-4 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 1-6 7-6(4) | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-3 | ||

D. Milavsky vs C. Broom Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 67.37% (64/31) | YTD Win/Loss | 62.17% (263/160) |
| 63.11% (142/83) | Sets Win/Loss | 59.58% (591/401) |
| 55.25% (1190/964) | Games Win/Loss | 54.00% (5054/4306) |
| 66.13% (41/21) | Hard Win/Loss | 65.99% (130/67) |
| 50.00% (3/3) | Clay Win/Loss | 66.67% (44/22) |
| 76.92% (20/6) | Indoor Hard W/L | 56.64% (64/49) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 53.19% (25/22) |
| 0.42 | Aces Per Game | 0.39 |
| 440 | Aces Total | 1782 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 294 | Total Double Faults | 1040 |
| 1:32:24 | Average Match Time | 1:28:4 |
| 370.55 | Average Opponent Rank | 384.49 |
| 61% (3431/5663) | 1st Serve % | 62% (15289/24616) |
| 72% (2467/3431) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (10707/15289) |
| 52% (1153/2232) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (4709/9326) |
| 41% (244/591) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (1115/2698) |
| 40% (2298/5712) | Return Points Win % | 41% (10721/26149) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 25.00% (1/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 20.00% (1/4) |
| 50.00% (11/11) | Challenger W/L | 45.76% (54/64) |
| 72.60% (53/20) | Futures W/L | 69.93% (207/89) |
| 66% (61/92) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (261/420) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 39% (11/28) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (71/137) |
| 56% (20/36) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (79/145) |
| 89% (61/54) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (250/218) |
| 10% (61/6) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (250/32) |
| 26% (34/9) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (173/45) |